Services
We deliver assessments the way mature security programs expect: realistic adversary tradecraft, evidence you can act on, and deliverables that speak to both leadership and technical teams. Below is what you can expect from each offering — scope is always tailored during kickoff. During active work, we post daily updates to your secure client dashboard so progress stays visible between kickoff and the final report.
Penetration testing Technical testing & remediation
What it is. Authorized, goal-oriented testing against your networks, applications, cloud environments, and supporting controls. We emulate real attackers to find weaknesses before they are exploited and to validate compensating controls.
What you get.
- Kickoff and rules of engagement aligned to your risk and compliance drivers
- Structured technical findings with severity, reproduction notes, and remediation guidance
- Executive summary suitable for leadership and board readouts
- Full PDF report plus access to the client portal with host detail, ports, credentials (masked), and supporting views
- Daily dashboard updates while the assessment is underway
- Remediation testing window (when scoped) to verify fixes
Ideal when you need to satisfy regulators, prepare for M&A, or benchmark program maturity against realistic threats.
Full methodology →Red teaming Adversary emulation & detection testing
What it is. A multi-phase campaign that tests detection and response, not only individual vulnerabilities. We use stealth, persistence, and lateral movement — including identity abuse and trust relationships — to stress your blue team and playbooks.
What you get.
- Scenario design tied to your crown jewels and threat model
- Structured timeline of actions with evidence artifacts
- Detection opportunities called out so SOC and IR can tune alerts and runbooks
- Clear narrative from initial access through impact, with time-to-objective where scoped
- Portal views for attack-path storytelling alongside the written report
- Daily dashboard updates during the operation window (when agreed in scope)
Choose this when you already run pentests and want to answer, “Would we see and stop a determined human adversary?”
Full methodology →Wireless network testing RF, coverage & rogue device analysis
What it is. Assessment of your Wi‑Fi footprint: SSIDs, encryption, rogue or mis-authorized access points, and coverage relative to your facilities.
What you get.
- Inventory of observed access points with encryption and rogue indicators
- Optional facility imagery with coverage overlays you can mark up for stakeholders
- Cracked or weak credential findings presented with masked values for safe review
- Hardening and architecture recommendations
- PDF and portal sections for AP tables, maps, and recommendations
Well suited for campus environments, retail, healthcare, and distributed offices where RF exposure matters.
Full methodology →Web application assessments Authentication, logic & API security
What it is. Focused testing of Internet-facing or internal web applications and APIs: authentication, session handling, access control, injection and XSS classes, file handling, business logic, and unsafe configurations — scoped as black, grey, or white box.
What you get.
- Application inventory captured in the portal (URLs, environments, auth model, stack)
- Severity overview and structured sections for attack surface, vulnerability themes, and exploitability
- Impact narrative (data exposed, privileges abused, chains across issues)
- Evidence-oriented detail for developers (endpoints, parameters, reproduction) and remediation / retest tracking
- PDF plus a multi-section web dashboard so executives see risk summaries while engineers drill into findings
- Daily portal updates for the duration of the engagement
Best when you need defensible assurance on a critical app, pre-release hardening, or M&A technical diligence on a product surface.
Full methodology →Physical security assessments Entry controls, social engineering & resilience
What it is. Evaluation of physical controls: entry points, locks, tailgating resistance, cameras, reception procedures, and related human factors.
What you get.
- Structured observations across controls, social engineering touchpoints, and entries
- Practical recommendations prioritized by risk and cost
- Documentation suitable for risk registers and improvement roadmaps
- Portal narrative sections aligned to your report
Often paired with network testing when you need a full attack surface picture.
Full methodology →API pentesting REST, GraphQL & SOAP security
What it is. Focused security testing of APIs powering web and mobile applications, partner integrations, and internal services. We test REST, GraphQL, and SOAP endpoints for authentication and authorization flaws, data exposure, injection, business logic abuse, rate-limiting weaknesses, and broken object-level access — following OWASP API Security Top 10.
What you get.
- Endpoint inventory (discovered and client-provided) with authentication model documented
- Findings organized by OWASP API risk category: BOLA, broken auth, excessive data exposure, mass assignment, security misconfiguration
- Evidence-driven reproductions with request/response pairs for developer handoff
- JWT, OAuth 2.0, and API key findings called out separately for security architecture review
- PDF report plus portal sections scoped to API findings and developer remediation notes
- Daily dashboard updates throughout the engagement
Recommended when APIs drive mobile apps, partner integrations, or access to sensitive data pipelines — often run alongside a web application assessment or as a standalone engagement.
Full methodology →Social engineering Phishing, vishing & human factor testing
What it is. Targeted campaigns designed to test human defenses: spear phishing emails, vishing calls, and pretexting scenarios. Engagements are scoped to your threat model — awareness baseline, credential harvesting simulation, or full multi-vector campaign that mirrors real adversary playbooks.
What you get.
- Campaign design aligned to your workforce profile and threat model (pretexts, sender infrastructure, payload selection)
- Click, open, and credential-submission metrics broken down by department or role
- Scenario narrative with annotated evidence safe for leadership review
- Awareness gap analysis identifying the highest-risk user segments
- Actionable training and control recommendations tied directly to observed behavior
- Portal report sections with campaign timeline and per-scenario outcomes
Often paired with a physical assessment for a combined human and physical attack surface evaluation. Also used as a pre-training baseline to measure program improvement over time.
Full methodology →IT security training Custom curriculum & hands-on instruction
What it is. Customized security education for technical teams, developers, and leadership — built around your environment, threat model, and skill gaps rather than generic off-the-shelf content. Delivery formats include instructor-led workshops, tabletop incident response exercises, developer secure-coding sessions, and end-user awareness programs.
What you get.
- Needs assessment to identify skill gaps and prioritize curriculum topics
- Custom course materials tailored to your team, stack, and threat environment
- Hands-on lab exercises using realistic scenarios (no contrived CTF content)
- Role-based modules: executive awareness, developer secure coding, SOC analyst tradecraft, IR tabletop
- Knowledge check assessments and completion documentation for compliance records
- Optional follow-up session to reinforce areas where gaps remain
Effective as a standalone program or as a follow-on to an assessment — we use findings from your engagement to make training immediately relevant to the real risks your team faces.
Course catalog →How we scope common program styles
Black box — We start with minimal insider knowledge, similar to an external adversary probing exposed services, applications, or people. You learn what is reachable and exploitable from the outside without tipping off internal teams with blueprints of the environment.
Assumed breach — We begin from a controlled foothold (workstation, VPN, or stolen credential scenario) and focus on lateral movement, privilege escalation, and business impact. This mirrors modern ransomware and APT tradecraft and exercises identity, segmentation, and detection.
Web application focus — A dedicated deep dive on one or more web properties: authentication, sessions, business logic, and OWASP-class issues. Can run standalone or as part of a broader pentest or red team.
We combine these modes when you need both “could they get in?” and “what happens if they already did?” answered in one program.
Frameworks & standards we follow
Our methodology is grounded in widely recognized frameworks and standards — so findings are consistently structured, defensible, and directly tied to accepted risk benchmarks.
PTES — Penetration Testing Execution Standard
Governs the structure and phases of our network and application pentests: intelligence gathering, threat modeling, exploitation, and post-exploitation.
OWASP Top 10 & OWASP API Security Top 10
Web and API findings are mapped to OWASP categories so developers and architects can prioritize remediation against an industry-standard risk taxonomy.
MITRE ATT&CK®
Red team and adversary emulation engagements are structured around ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) — giving your blue team directly actionable detection opportunities.
NIST CSF & SP 800-115
Executive summaries and remediation priorities are aligned to NIST Cybersecurity Framework tiers, supporting compliance reporting and board-level risk discussions.
CIS Controls
Hardening and configuration recommendations reference CIS Benchmark controls so remediation teams have prescriptive, community-vetted guidance to implement.
Ready to talk specifics? Contact us or use the form on the home page — we will help you pick the right depth, duration, and rules of engagement.